Surveys

Enquête mobilité des personnes 2019 (EMP)

Code: emp2019

Link: https://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/resultats-detailles-de-lenquete-mobilite-des-personnes-de-2019

Tested version: November 2024

Notes:

  • Many variables from the original survey data are not read because they are not part of any other survey type.
  • The survey does not guarantee any representativeness at the regional level.
  • Only one person per household is surveyed for their trips and additional characteristics.
  • The car type is not specified. Cars can include passenger cars, utilitary cars and recreational cars.
  • The survey includes data on 58 “voiturettes”, 59 “quads”, and 1 “tricycle” as a special vehicle category, which is not read by MobiSurvStd.
  • Walking legs are not specified in the survey data for trips combining walking with other modes.

Enquêtes mobilité certifiés Cerema (EMC²)

Code: emc2

Link: https://www.cerema.fr/fr/activites/mobilites/connaissance-modelisation-evaluation-mobilite/enquetes-mobilite-emc2

Download link (for researchers): https://data.progedo.fr/series/adisp/enquetes-menages-deplacements-emd-enquetes-mobilite-certifiee-cerema-emc

Tested surveys:

  • Alençon 2018
  • Angers 2022
  • Besançon 2018
  • Bordeaux 2021
  • Bouzonville 2019
  • Brest 2018
  • Chambéry 2022
  • Évreux 2018
  • Gap 2018
  • Grenoble 2020
  • Lannion 2022
  • Le Havre 2018
  • Marseille 2020
  • Pointe-à-Pitre 2021
  • Poitiers 2018
  • Reims 2021
  • Rennes 2018
  • Sables d’Olonne 2021
  • Saint-Étienne 2021
  • Tours 2019
  • Valenciennes 2019
  • Vendée 2020

Notes:

  • The survey detailed zones correspond to the “zones fines” (“ZF”), which are usually the size of IRIS zones or smaller.
  • For most surveys, there are special locations corresponding to “Générateurs de trafic” (“GT”), which represent e.g., train stations or hospitals.
  • Draw zones correspond to the survey’s “zones de tirage”.
  • For each trips, the non-walking legs are recorded. MobiSurvStd reconstruct the walking legs using the access / egress walking time variables. This means that the leg travel time is known only for the walking legs (as it is not a recorded variable for the other legs).

Enquête Globale Transport 2018-2020

Code: egt2020

Link: https://data.progedo.fr/studies/doi/10.13144/lil-1581

Notes:

  • There is no draw zones because the survey was interrupted before the end due to Covid-19.
  • There is no detailed zone but the coordinates of the origins / destinations are known (rounded to 100 meters).
  • The car types are not specified but utilitary cars and recreational cars ar excluded.
  • Motorcycles’ parking data is not read because the survey’s documentation is incorrect.
  • Variable main_mode_group can differ from the original MODP_H7 variable because MobiSurvStd uses a different definition of mode groups and a different methodology to identify the main mode.
  • The start_insee and end_insee values are derived from the leg’s coordinates, using INSEE data from 2025.
  • The work_insee and study_insee values are derived from the given coordinates, using INSEE data from 2025. There can be some errors because of the 100m rounding.

Enquêtes Déplacements Grands Territoires (EDGT)

Code: edgt

Link: https://www.cerema.fr/fr/activites/mobilites/connaissance-modelisation-evaluation-mobilite/enquetes-mobilite-emc2

Download link (for researchers): https://data.progedo.fr/studies?q=edgt

Tested surveys:

  • Amiens 2010
  • Angers 2012
  • Annecy 2017
  • Annemasse 2016
  • Bayonne 2010
  • Clermont-Ferrand 2012
  • Dijon 2016
  • Dunkerque 2015
  • Lyon 2015
  • Marseille 2009
  • Metz 2017
  • Montpellier 2014
  • Nancy 2013
  • Nantes 2015
  • Nice 2009
  • Saint-Denis-de-la-Réunion 2016
  • Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines 2010
  • Valence 2014

Notes:

  • The survey detailed zones correspond to the “zones fines” (“ZF”), which are usually the size of IRIS zones or smaller.
  • For most surveys, there are special locations corresponding to “Générateurs de trafic” (“GT”), which represent e.g., train stations or hospitals.
  • Draw zones correspond to the survey’s “zones de tirage”.
  • For each trips, the non-walking legs are recorded. MobiSurvStd reconstruct the walking legs using the access / egress walking time variables. This means that the leg travel time is known only for the walking legs (as it is not a recorded variable for the other legs).

Enquêtes Déplacements Villes Moyennes (EDVM)

Code: edvm

Link: https://www.cerema.fr/fr/activites/mobilites/connaissance-modelisation-evaluation-mobilite/enquetes-mobilite-emc2

Download link (for researchers): https://data.progedo.fr/studies?q=edvm

Tested surveys:

  • Ajaccio 2017
  • Albi 2011
  • Angoulême 2012
  • Arras 2014
  • Beauvais 2010
  • Béziers 2014
  • Bourg-en-Bresse 2017
  • Carcassonne 2015
  • Châlon-sur-Saône 2014
  • Cherbourg 2016
  • Créil 2017
  • Dinan 2010
  • La Rochelle 2011
  • La-Roche-sur-Yon 2013
  • Laval 2011
  • Le Creusot 2012
  • Les Sables d’Olonne 2011
  • Longwy 2014
  • Niort 2016
  • Puisaye-Forterre et Aillantais 2012
  • Quimper 2013
  • Roanne 2012
  • Saint-Brieuc 2012
  • Saintes 2016
  • Saint-Louis 2011
  • Thionville 2012
  • Var 2012

Notes:

  • The survey detailed zones correspond to the “zones fines” (“ZF”), which are usually the size of IRIS zones or smaller.
  • For most surveys, there are special locations corresponding to “Générateurs de trafic” (“GT”), which represent e.g., train stations or hospitals.
  • Draw zones correspond to the survey’s “zones de tirage”.
  • For each trips, the non-walking legs are recorded. MobiSurvStd reconstruct the walking legs using the access / egress walking time variables. This means that the leg travel time is known only for the walking legs (as it is not a recorded variable for the other legs).

Enquêtes Ménages Déplacements (EMD)

Code: emd

Link: https://www.cerema.fr/fr/activites/mobilites/connaissance-modelisation-evaluation-mobilite/enquetes-mobilite-emc2

Download link (for researchers): https://data.progedo.fr/studies?q=emd

Tested surveys:

  • Douai 2012
  • Fort-de-France 2014
  • Grenoble 2010
  • Lille 2016
  • Nîmes 2015
  • Rouen 2017
  • Saint-Étienne 2010
  • Strasbourg 2009
  • Toulouse 2013
  • Valenciennes 2011

Notes:

  • The survey detailed zones correspond to the “zones fines” (“ZF”), which are usually the size of IRIS zones or smaller.
  • For most surveys, there are special locations corresponding to “Générateurs de trafic” (“GT”), which represent e.g., train stations or hospitals.
  • Draw zones correspond to the survey’s “zones de tirage”.
  • For each trips, the non-walking legs are recorded. MobiSurvStd reconstruct the walking legs using the access / egress walking time variables. This means that the leg travel time is known only for the walking legs (as it is not a recorded variable for the other legs).

Enquête Globale Transport 2010

Code: egt2010

Link: https://data.progedo.fr/studies/doi/10.13144/lil-0883

Notes:

  • The detailed zones correspond to the 100m by 100m cells.
  • For now, only the weekday trips are standardized.